Get ready for a big jump in coking coal prices

Coal price volatility has not been an issue for the Japanese steel mills since the industry switched to quarterly pricing in April 2010.  Over the last 12 months, quarter-on-quarter price changes for coking coal has ranged from just 7% to no more than 12%:

Contrast this with the huge price swings of the last two years:  In 2008, following extensive flood damage to Australian mining and transportation infrastructure, the price of coking coal jumped by 206% from $98/tonne to $300/tonne – before dropping by 57% in JFY 2009. In Q1 2010, the price jumped by 55% – from $129 to $200.

Now the industry is bracing itself for yet another major jump in pricing, following the worst flooding in Australian history; already coking coal spot deals have been reported at $350 per tonne or more.

No surprise then that over the last few weeks we have seen numerous forecasts for metallurgical coal pricing for the April – June quarter, with some estimates as high as $400 – 500 per tonne, although this has raised a few eyebrows.

Last week,  at the McCloskey US Coal Conference in Miami, we saw the first meaningful  industry comment – from Xcoal CEO Ernie Thrasher,  indicating $300 – 320 as an expected range for the April – June settlement.

Those numbers should prove to be very close to the final settlement; we can certainly expect to see at least $300 per tonne, reflecting 2008 pricing and mirroring the supply tightness created at that time by the previous round of Queensland flooding.

So. How much more than $300? – well, perhaps an extra $25, as producers want pricing to properly reflect  the current tightness in the market, which is far worse than the tight supply seen in 2008.

Anything over $325 may only be on the table if the steel mills see continuing improvement in hot rolled coil prices, which over the last 3 months have risen from $670 (in late November, when the current coking coal price of $225 was struck),  to current levels around US$820 per tonne.

Disclaimer for Kobie Koornhof:

In preparing this article, we have relied not only on in-house expertise but also information derived from our databases and a wide range of data sources, including but not limited to both industry and public domain sources, for which we are not responsible and cannot reasonably be held to be responsible.

We have made every reasonable effort to ensure that the information and assumptions on which these statements and projections are based are current, reasonable, and complete. However, a number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, anticipated results or other expectations expressed in this article. These statements and projections are made in good faith, but we cannot guarantee that the anticipated future results will be achieved.

Koornhof Associates will not be liable to any person or entity for the quality, accuracy, completeness, reliability or timeliness of information in this article, or for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental, special or punitive damages that may arise out of the use of information, from any person or entity, including but not limited to lost profits, loss of opportunities, trading losses, and damages that may result from any incompleteness or inaccuracy in the article.

Comments

No comments found.

{{ commodity.name }}

Contest Ranking Modal BG Contest Ranking Modal BG
Contest Ranking Title

The new Mining Power Rankings are live. Vote for the sector’s leaders in each of the Large-, Small-, and Micro-Cap leagues.

Vote Now